Sen. Trip Pittman
Sen. Rusty Glover
Sen. Paul Bussman
Sen. Greg Reed
Sen. Clay Scofield
Sen. Dick Brewbaker
Sen. J. T. Waggoner
Sen. Del Marsh
Sen. Gerald Allen
Sen. Bryan Taylor
Sen. Slade Blackwell
Sen. Gerald Dial
Sen. Paul Sanford
Sen. Tom Whatley
Sen. Cam Ward
Sen. Jimmy W. Holley
SB300 - Regular Session 2012
- Introduced - 02/14/2012
- Passed First House - 04/05/2012
- Passed Second House - 04/26/2012
- Sent to Governor
- Law - 05/01/2012
Description
Unemployment compensation, compensable week further defined, Sec. 25-4-73 am'd.
| Sponsor | Sen. Trip Pittman [Republican, 32] |
| Cosponsor(s) |
|
| Current Status | Enacted (Enacted 2012-299) |
| Introduced | Feb 14, 2012 |
| Last Action On | May 01, 2012 |
| Last Action | Enrolled |
| Suject(s) |
Fiscal Analysis
| Fiscal Notes for sb300 (Regular Session 2012) |
| Committee: | Sponsor: Pittman |
| Analyst: Daniel Davenport | Date: 06/27/2012 |
FISCAL NOTE
Senate Bill 300 (Act 2012-299) as enacted could reduce benefits paid from the Unemployment Compensation Trust Fund by an estimated $11.4 million per year by moving the one-week waiting period that an individual serves without receiving benefits from after the thirteenth week to the first week. The savings would come from individuals that serve the waiting period during the first week and come off the rolls before the waiting period between week 13 and 14 and before receiving their full amount of benefits.
| Committee: Commerce and Small Business | Sponsor: Pittman |
| Analyst: Daniel Davenport | Date: 04/10/2012 |
FISCAL NOTE
Senate Bill 300 as passed the Senate could reduce benefits paid from the Unemployment Compensation Trust Fund by an estimated $11.4 million per year by moving the one-week waiting period that an individual serves without receiving benefits from after the thirteenth week to the first week. The savings would come from individuals that serve the waiting period during the first week and come off the rolls before the waiting period between week 13 and 14 and before receiving their full amount of benefits.
| Jack Williams, Chair Commerce and Small Business |
Viewable text not yet available.
Committee Meetings
| Meeting Date | Committee | Time | Location |
|---|
Bill History
| Action Date | Chamber | Action | Audio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2012 | Senate | Read for the first time and referred to the Senate committee on Job Creation and Economic Development | Files |
| Feb 21, 2012 | Senate | Read for the second time and placed on the calendar | Files |
| Apr 05, 2012 | Senate | Third Reading Passed | Files |
| Apr 05, 2012 | Senate | Petition to cease debate adopted Roll Call 464. | Files |
| Apr 05, 2012 | Senate | Motion to Read a Third Time and Pass adopted Roll Call 465 | Files |
| Apr 10, 2012 | House | Read for the first time and referred to the House of Representatives committee on Commerce and Small Business | Files |
| Apr 12, 2012 | House | Read for the second time and placed on the calendar | Files |
| Apr 26, 2012 | House | Motion to Read a Third Time and Pass adopted Roll Call 1037 | Files |
| Apr 26, 2012 | House | Third Reading Passed | Files |
| Apr 26, 2012 | Senate | Passed Second House | Files |
| May 01, 2012 | Executive | Forwarded to Executive Department | Files |
| May 01, 2012 | Executive | Assigned Act No. 2012-299. | Files |
| May 01, 2012 | House | Signature Requested | Files |
| May 01, 2012 | Senate | Enrolled | Files |
BIR Actions
Budget Isolation Resolution - The procedure by which the passage of the two budget bills (general and education) is given priority in the regular session. Passage of any other legislation must be preceded by the adoption of a resolution exempting it from the budget isolation process.
For a list of other terms used in the legislative process, view the state's legislative glossary page.
| Action Date | Chamber | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 05, 2012 | Senate | Pittman motion to Adopt adopted Roll Call 463 |
| Apr 05, 2012 | Senate | Introduced |
| Apr 26, 2012 | House | Introduced |
| Apr 26, 2012 | House | Williams (J) motion to Adopt adopted Roll Call 1036 |
Comments
comments powered by Disqus